• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • About
  • Policies
  • Events
  • Publications
  • Contact
  • Support
  • JOIN

Australian Family Party

Family Matters

  • Family Resilience
  • Family Economics
  • Family Technology
  • Free to Speak
  • Free to Believe
  • Free to Work

Defence

Australian Idol

20/10/2025 by Australian Family Party

australian idolWhen John D. Rockefeller died in 1937, he was reputedly the richest man in the world.

At his funeral were many of his employees as well as a large contingent from the press.

Spotting Rockefeller’s chief accountant in the crowd, a young journalist from The Washington Post approached the accountant after the funeral.

“Weren’t you Mr Rockefeller’s accountant?” enquired the journalist.

“Yes, I was,” replied the accountant.

“Tell me,” whispered the journalist, “How much did he leave?”

“All of it,” whispered the accountant.

Rockefeller built Standard Oil, amassing (in today’s money) a $400bn fortune. He treated wealth as ‘life’s purpose’, crushing anyone who got in his way. In later life he admitted that his early greed was ‘demonic’.

Napoleon conquered all of Europe for political glory, crowning himself ‘Emperor of the French, King of Italy, Protector of the Rhine, King of Spain and King of Holland’.

For sporting glory, Lance Armstrong admitted to doping in seven consecutive Tour de France wins.

Examples of the pursuit of beauty and body-building image are too numerous to list.

Those who seek personal glory and those who seek financial opportunity are often frequent bedfellows. As are a good many cosy relationships between businesspeople and governments.

The French have a saying, ‘Plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose’ – the more things change, the more they remain the same.

The Bible, for example, recounts the incidence of a riot in Ephesus in 55AD.

The Apostle Paul had been preaching the gospel, and a number of people were converted to Christianity causing a drop in trade for the local idol-makers.

“About that time there arose a great disturbance … A silversmith named Demetrius, who made silver shrines of Artemis, brought in a lot of business for the craftsmen there. He called them together, along with the workers in related trades, and said: “You know, my friends, that we receive a good income from this business. And you see and hear how this fellow Paul has convinced and led astray large numbers of people here in Ephesus and in practically the whole province of Asia. He says that gods made by human hands are no gods at all. There is a danger that not only our trade will lose its good name, but also that the temple of the great goddess Artemis will be discredited; and the goddess herself, who is worshiped throughout the province of Asia and the world, will be robbed of her divine majesty.” (Acts 19:23–27)

Classic rent-seeking.

In recent times, Climate Change and its handmaiden Renewable Energy have become man-made idols and, like Rockefeller and Demitrius, anyone or anything standing in their way is crushed.

A good example of Renewable Energy being like ‘gods made by human hands which are no gods at all’, is so-called ‘green hydrogen’.

In 1975 – 50 years ago – during the 94th Congress, the US House of Representatives held the first of two investigative hearings on the subject of hydrogen – ‘its production, utilization, and potential effects on our energy economy of the future’.

The hearing was chaired by Congressman Mike McCormack, who claimed hydrogen ‘had the potential of playing the same kind of role in our energy system as electricity does today’.

In 2003 – 22 years ago – economist Jeremy Rifkin, published The Hydrogen Economy: The Creation of the Worldwide Energy Web and the Redistribution of Power on Earth.

In that book, Rifkin claimed that ‘Globalization represents the end stage of the fossil-fuel era. Turning toward hydrogen is a promissory note for a safer world’.

Then-President George W. Bush bought into the vision. In his 2003 State of the Union Address, he said, ‘With a new national commitment, our scientists and engineers will overcome the obstacles associated with taking hydrogen-fuelled automobiles from the laboratory to the showroom so that the first car driven by a child born today (2003) could be powered by hydrogen, and pollution-free’.

According to the US Bureau of Statistics, there were 4,089,000 children born in the United States in 2003.

Now aged 22, not one of them has bought a hydrogen-fuelled automobile.

A few months after his speech, the Bush Administration announced a collaborative effort with the European Union for ‘the development of a hydrogen economy’, including the technologies ‘needed for mass production of safe and affordable hydrogen-powered fuel cell vehicles’.

Hydrogen is indeed abundant, but it is not a source of energy. Like petrol or electricity, it must be manufactured. Which, in energy terms, is very expensive (it takes three units of electrical energy to produce two units of hydrogen energy). In other words, it requires a lot of electricity to make a small amount of hydrogen that is hard to handle, difficult to store, and expensive to use.

And yet, despite all that has been known for the past 30+ years, in 2019, South Australia’s politicians pumped hundreds of millions of dollars of taxpayers’ money into green hydrogen schemes.

In its Renewable Hydrogen Action Plan, the Office of Hydrogen Power announced ‘500,000 tonnes of green hydrogen would be produced annually by 2030’.

It has just been shut down.

If we want a strong enough economy that can build a strong military that can defend us against looming regional threats, then our politicians need to abandon their obsession with man-made idols such as climate change and renewable energy.

Swedish Statesman Axel Oxenstierna summed up the situation this way, “Behold my son, with how little wisdom the world is governed.”

That was 1640 – nearly 400 years ago.

Plus ça change …

Filed Under: Green hydrogen, Australia's economic future, Australian Politics, Climate Change, Defence, Family Policy, Net Zero, Renewable energy

A Few Good Men

20/09/2025 by Australian Family Party

few-good-menIn that classic scene from the movie A Few Good Men, Lieutenant Daniel Kaffee, played by Tom Cruise is defending two Marines accused of murdering a fellow Marine based at Guantanamo Bay.

Kaffee believes the Marines were following a ‘Code Red’ – an illegal order for extrajudicial punishment – issued by Colonel Nathan Jessep, the base commander, played by Jack Nicholson.

Kaffee gets under the skin of Jessep who is a formidable, authoritative figure who sees himself as above reproach.

During a tense exchange, Kaffee asks Colonel Jessep, “Did you order a Code Red?”

The Court Martial Judge quickly interjects with, “You don’t have to answer that question.”

Jessep arrogantly responds, “I’ll answer his question”.

“You want answers?” Jessep sneers.

“I think I’m entitled”, replies Kaffee.

“You want answers?” Jessep shouts.

“I want the truth!” Kaffee shouts back.

Jessep then blurts out his famous line, “YOU CAN’T HANDLE THE TRUTH!”

Kaffee once again demands to know, “DID YOU ORDER A CODE RED!”

Jessep erupts with, “Son, we live in a world that has walls, and those walls have to be guarded by men with guns.

“Who’s gonna do that? You?

“I have a greater responsibility than you can possibly fathom … and my existence, while grotesque and incomprehensible to you, saves lives.

“You don’t want the truth because deep down you want me on that wall, you need me on that wall.

“We use words like honour, code, loyalty. We use these words as the backbone of a life spent defending something.

“You use them as a punchline.

“I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the blanket of the very freedom that I provide and then questions the manner in which I provide it.

“I would rather you just said thank you and went on your way. Otherwise, I suggest you pick up a weapon and stand a post”.

When this movie was released in 1992, Tom Cruise’s character Daniel Kaffee was, as you’d expect, the good guy, and Jack Nicholson, the baddie.

But the Utopian post-World War II, post-Soviet Union, ‘End of History’ world that gave rise to movies like A Few Good Men didn’t last.

The world never was, nor is it now, how we’d like or wish it to be. The cruel truth is that our desire for a just, kind, or ideal world inevitably clashes with the harsh, indifferent, and unpredictable nature of reality.

In 2022, in a military news outlet called Task & Purpose, retired US Marine 3-star General Gregory Newbold expounded on this theme in an attempt to remind the civilian population of what the military is and what it does.

“Many citizens – especially our most senior politicians and military leaders – seem to have developed a form of dementia when it comes to warfare. The result is confusion or denial about the essential ingredients of a competent military force. The condition is exacerbated and enabled when the most senior military leaders who ought to know better defer to the idealistic judgements of those whose credentials are either non-existent or formed entirely by ideology.

Newbold is referring to the Lt Kaffees of the world.

He continues: “The military has two main purposes – to deter our enemies from engaging us in warfare and if that fails, to defeat them in combat. Deterrence is only possible if the opposing force believes it will be defeated. Respect is not good enough; fear and certainty are required.

“The military cannot be a mirror-image of the society it serves. Values that are admirable in civilian society – sensitivity, individuality, compassion, tolerance for the less-capable – are often antithetical to the traits that deter a potential enemy and win wars that must be fought.

“There is only one over-riding standard for military capability – lethality – the ability to kill. And the officeholders who dilute this core truth with civil society’s often appropriate priorities undermine the military’s chances of success. Reduced chances of success mean more casualties which makes defeat more likely.

“Wars must be waged only with stone-cold pragmatism, not idealism. War is a means to an end, and the end is defeat of the enemy and the establishment of a peace, but not just any peace but a peace in your favour.

In an ominous warning of troubling times ahead, The Australian’s Paul Kelly reported recently:

“This week the dictators came together in Beijing – Xi Jinping, flanked by Russian President Vladimir Putin and North Korean leader Kim Jong-un – in a display of authoritarian power rarely matched since World War II.

“The vast military display featured nuclear-capable missiles, undersea vehicles, the latest drones, fighter jets, anti-ship missiles and long-range bombers reinforced by thousands of troops goose-stepping in almost perfect co-ordination.

“China intends to dominate in industrial, military and ideological domains.

“Xi’s message is that China’s military dominance of the Asian region will be irresistible.

“The world has just witnessed the most powerful symbolic display of China’s military aspirations with their intimidating logic for Australia.

“And what did our government have to say?

“Nothing – or nothing of any note.

“We cannot even find the language to address the events transforming the world that pose the most serious challenge for our country and people.”

I have never been anti-China.

Bob-Day-Xi-AbbottAs reported in my previous comments on China in Beijing to Damascus – A Road to Peace, China has a fascinating Judeo-Christian history.

I have also met Xi Jinping, albeit briefly, in 2014. We talked about housing and how Chinese investors viewed Australia’s property market very favourably.

But a lot that has happened since then disturbs me greatly.

We need options. Our total reliance on the United States is untenable. Its growing internal divisions could seriously impact its external commitments.

One alternative defence bloc could be a Japan–South Korea–Philippines alliance; however, these are all conventional military powers. They would be no match for a nuclear superpower such as China.

India is a friend and is a rising geo-political player. It is also a nuclear power.

But India looks after India, and being an avowed Hindu country, is also culturally very different from Australia.

As Kelly reports, in Beijing, leaders from China, Russia, Iran and North Korea met and did not hide their contempt for the West.

Which brings us once again to Israel.

Israel is currently fighting a war defending Western Civilization.

It is a military superpower.

We should develop a closer relationship.

The Israel-Gaza conflict will soon be over, but China’s military expansion will not.

Can we handle the truth?

Filed Under: Australian Politics, China, Christianity, Defence, Family Policy, Freedom, Israel, Israel-Hamas War, Social policy

Primary Sidebar

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Bob Day AO, Federal Director Profile

Bob-Day-AO

Profile is here.

Subscribe to our Mailing list!

* indicates required



Recent Posts

  • Australian Idol
  • Shelter from the Storm
  • A Few Good Men
  • Standing on the Promises
  • The Promised Land
  • On Wings of Eagles
  • Fox and Friends
  • Life Lessons from Les Mis
  • Noughts and Crosses
  • Rock, Paper, Scissors
  • VUCA World
  • The Eyes Have It
  • Lessons from Lausanne (Revisited)
  • On Your Marx …

© 2025 The Australian Family Party
Privacy Policy
Contact Us