• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • About
  • Policies
  • Events
  • Publications
  • Contact
  • Support
  • JOIN

Australian Family Party

Family Matters

  • Family Resilience
  • Family Economics
  • Family Technology
  • Free to Speak
  • Free to Believe
  • Free to Work

Monarchy

The 44% Alarm Bell

17/11/2025 by Australian Family Party

democracyIt’s been said that ‘Optimists learn English, pessimists learn Chinese, and realists learn how to use an AK47.’

We’re probably not quite at that stage just yet but it is good to be reminded as to how and why we are not.

Above the Courts of Justice in London stands a statue of Jesus. It is there to signify the Common Law’s origins in Christianity.

When the King is presented with the Bible, these words are spoken: “To keep your Majesty ever mindful of the law and the Gospel of God, …. we present you with this Book, the most valuable thing this world affords. Here is wisdom; this is the royal law; these are the lively oracles of God”. Stephen Langton, Archbishop of Canterbury (1207-1228) helped write the Magna Carta, the world’s pre-eminent document on human rights which forms the basis of so many of our laws.

A recent Report (November 2025) published by Flinders University, Turning Away from Democracy? Democratic Antipathy and Support for Undemocratic Practices Among Young Australians, found that only 56 per cent of young Australians (18–29) believe democracy is the best form of government. That 44 per cent of young people do not believe it is the best form of government is alarming to say the least.

Some of its other findings are equally alarming. For example, 38 per cent of young Australians support ‘the use of force to prevent policies they disagree with from being enacted’; 39 per cent agree that ‘the government should be able to bend the law when required’; 36 per cent agree that ‘the Prime Minister should be able to ignore court decisions’; and 25 per cent support ‘committing voter fraud to prevent a party they dislike from winning’.

When our system of government is being questioned in this way, it is timely to consider some of the world’s alternatives. Writer Evan Thompson provides a useful summary:

  • Theocracy. A form of government in which a specific religious ideology determines the leadership, laws and customs of the country. Iran is the world’s largest theocracy in which the Ayatollahs — Shiite religious leaders — rule the country and implement Islamic Sharia law. Iran has immense influence on several neighbouring countries.
  • Military Dictatorships. Rule by a single authority with absolute power and no democratic process. Installed by the nation’s armed forces, military dictators dismiss due process, civil liberties, and political freedoms. Dissent or political opposition is banned by the ruling military junta. Examples include Myanmar, Sudan, Chad and Mali.
  • Monarchy. Not to be confused with Constitutional Monarchies such as our own, ruling monarchies have a person as head of state for life, a position passed down through a succession line related to one’s bloodline and birth order within a ruling royal family. Today’s monarchies include Saudi Arabia, Morocco and Oman.
  • Communism.  A centralized form of government headed by a single authoritarian political party. Total control of the economy and of production, labour, goods, property and natural resources. Communist countries include China, Cuba, Laos and Vietnam.
  • Totalitarianism. A form of government in which the ruling party sets no limitations whatsoever on its power. Its citizens are completely subservient to the state. A single figure often holds power and maintains authority through widespread surveillance, control of the media, intimidating demonstrations of military or police power, and suppression of protest, activism, or political opposition. North Korea is an example of a totalitarian state. Any criticism of the supreme leader is punishable by death.
  • Authoritarianism – a lesser form of totalitarianism in which an authoritarian government rejects political plurality and uses strong central power to preserve the status quo. Authoritarianism pays little regard to the rule of law, the separation of powers between parliament and the courts, or democratic voting. Much of Central and Eastern Europe, Africa, the Middle East, Asia, Latin America and the Caribbean falls into this category.

Of the 193 countries in the world, 153 of them are governed by one of these non-democratic systems. Barely 40 countries in the world are functioning democracies. And of those 40, 36 have a Judeo-Christian heritage and the other four (India, Japan, South Korea and Taiwan) had strong Christian/Western influence that led them to democracy.

The link between Christianity and stable democracy is obvious and sometimes we need to remind ourselves of Christianity’s great contributions to the world.

The late Rabbi Jonathan Sacks said, “To defend a country you need an army. But to defend a free society you need families, schools and an educational system in which ideals are passed on from one generation to the next, and never lost, or despaired of, or obscured. It is not difficult to gain liberty, but to sustain it is the work of a hundred generations. Forget it and you lose it.”

Thank you for your support.

 

Filed Under: Australian Character, Australian Politics, Christianity, Culture Wars, Family Policy, Foxes and hedgehogs, Freedom, Monarchy, Social policy

Checkmate

14/09/2022 by Australian Family Party

Checkmate-Elizabeth-CharlesDuring the Republican Referendum debate in 1999, people would often ask, “The Queen seems like a very nice person, but what exactly does she do that benefits us?”  I’d respond by saying, “It’s not what the Queen does, it’s what she stops other people from doing!”

More about that shortly.

When the Republican Movement started in the early 1990s, I immediately joined Australians for Constitutional Monarchy (ACM) and offered my services to them. It was at the Adelaide Town Hall launch in November 1993 that I met ACM organiser Tony Abbott, Adelaide identity Kym Bonython, editor of The Adelaide Review Christopher Pearson and Federal Court (later High Court) judge Michael Kirby. After the launch, the five of us went to the Oxford Hotel in North Adelaide for dinner to discuss tactics. So began a long association with the cause.

Asking ‘What exactly does the Monarch do?’ is a bit like asking, ‘What exactly does that guard out front of the bank do all day’?

Knowing what we know about human nature, we are not naïve enough to think there aren’t closet dictators and tyrants lurking even in Australia. There are those among us who believe they are above the people, they disdain the people and resent having to answer to them. They are not as rare as you might think.

In 1975, former Prime Minister Gough Whitlam tried to govern without the consent of parliament and was subsequently sacked by the Queen’s representative, the Governor-General.

We can be sure no-one will ever try that again – govern without the consent of parliament, that is! You only have to do it once.

With the passing of Queen Elizabeth II, everyone it seems has their own special reflections on our late Queen.

For me, I was born the year she ascended the throne – 1952. My father was born in the same year as her – 1926, and my mother adored her. She spoke warmly of her throughout her life, from her war-time exploits – my mother was in England’s Land Army – to the Queen’s annual Christmas Message. My mother never missed a message.

But now, at the age of 96, the Queen has gone. Not quite as old as her husband Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh (or ‘Fella-Belong-Mrs-Queen’ as they call him in PNG’s Pidgin English) who was 99 when he died last year, but a wonderful age all the same.

Speaking of dying at 99, the Queen greatly admired the American evangelist Billy Graham who also died aged 99. As some wag said at the time, ‘God obviously wasn’t a cricket fan, giving his best player out on 99 …!’

Over a period of more than 30 years – from the 1950s to the late 1980s, the Queen met with Billy Graham at least a dozen times.

“For me, the teachings of Christ and my own personal accountability before God provide a framework in which I try to lead my life”, she said.

David Bruce, Executive Vice-President of the Billy Graham Evangelistic Association said,

“Reverend Graham would say Queen Elizabeth was a deeply spiritual person. We know from listening often to her Christmas messages to the British Commonwealth, that she would invoke the gospel.

“Reverend Graham took every opportunity to end their meetings in prayer”, he said.

Here in Australia, the Republican Movement is once again firing up, sensing perhaps an opportunity to change our system of government from a Constitutional Monarchy to a Republic. From a monarch represented in Australia by a Governor-General as Head of State, to our very own President.

And there’s the rub.

How will this President be elected or appointed – by the people as in the United States? Or by a select few?

There is no doubt that if a President were to be elected, it would be a political contest. Just what we need, replacing a non-political monarch with a Donald Trump or Joe Biden or Hillary Clinton. Wonderful.

Current political leaders and academics can see the obvious flaws in a direct-election model of voting for a President. The politicisation of the office of Head of State, as in the US, would be unbearable. The last thing we need is another layer of politics.

And yet, consistent polling since 1999 shows that if we are to become a Republic and have a President as Head of State, then the people want to be the ones to elect him or her. So, for the foreseeable future, King replaces Queen. Checkmate.

One thing’s for sure, Australians will not be persuaded to change to a Republic by academics like Professor Greg Craven and his silly 1999 full-page ads:

Who will you put first –

YOUR FAMILY or the ROYAL FAMILY?

Professor Craven would do well to remember Margaret Thatcher’s maxim, ‘First you win the argument, then you win the election’ (or referendum as the case may be) and leave the writing of political ads to Clive Palmer.

So, the current system will remain with us for the time being, and Australians, as is the Australian way, will give the new King a fair go.

Not that Charles is a stranger to us. He has visited Australia no less than 16 times, even spending part of his schooling here.

God save the King.

Thank you for your support.

Filed Under: Australian Character, Australian Politics, Freedom, Monarchy, Social policy

Primary Sidebar

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Bob Day AO, Federal Director Profile

Bob-Day-AO

Profile is here.

Subscribe to our Mailing list!

* indicates required



Recent Posts

  • Bounce Back Better
  • The 44% Alarm Bell
  • Courtroom Guinea Pigs
  • Australian Idol
  • Shelter from the Storm
  • A Few Good Men
  • Standing on the Promises
  • The Promised Land
  • On Wings of Eagles
  • Fox and Friends
  • Life Lessons from Les Mis
  • Noughts and Crosses
  • Rock, Paper, Scissors
  • VUCA World

© 2025 The Australian Family Party
Privacy Policy
Contact Us